.

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Foundations of Learning and Collaborative Working Essay Example for Free

Foundations of study and Collaborative Working Es set upDiscuss the concept of cooperative bending within your professional firmament To be able to understand the rationale, the different factors influencing the verbotencome of collaborative working and how this stinker be use to Perioperative practice, it is important to score a sound understanding of the concept Collaborative Working. This concept has many terminological variations, one of the more frequently used is Inter-professional working. Hornby and Atkins (2000) state that collaborative working is a relationship amid two or more people, groups or organisations, working together to define and achieve a leafy vegetable purpose. Barrett et al (2005) decl atomic number 18s that inter-professional working is the process whereby members of different professions and/or agencies work together to provide integrated health and/or social c be for the benefit of service users. Disregarding what is ascertainn as the corr ect/incorrect terminology, the putting green denominator here is that all health care provide/ agencies are working together to provide the silk hat health care possible for patients and service users.There have been many debates about the variation in terminology, Leathard (19945) refers to it as terminological quagmire that has been created overdue to rapid victimisations in practice, and in her analysis of terms, Leathard (19946) prefers to use the term multi-professional as it infers a wider group of professionals. In this instance the term Collaborative working leave be used. everywhere the geezerhood there have been many drivers behind the rationale for collaborative working dating as far back as the 1960s in the USA, where Henderson (1966) reports that one hospital has weekly inter-professional ward conferences. The humor of collaborative working is therefore not a relatively new concept. In recent forms increased emphasis has been placed on collaborative working an d the need to work together due to changes in applied science, accountability and government reports. Technological advances such as telecommunication is now used by surgical staff to live feed surgical procedures to different parts of the world. This has aided remote-area surgeons in their proclaim practices (Shields Werder 2002)Similarly, the introduction of the National Health Service (NHS) direct advice line has created a way in which doctors can consult patients over the telephone. However a study by the Economic and Social Research Council (2005) cerebrate that telemedicine is disappearing compared to NHS direct advice line. The introduction to new machinery which takes blood pressures automatically rather than manually, this and other technological advances have all required healthcare staff to change the ways in which they work collaboratively. On the other hand, Government reports also change the way in which healthcare professionals work as they are much mandatory me asures. The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework (KSF) was introduced in 1999 under the Agenda for Change. Day (2006) claims that the use of KSF will enable team leaders to identify gaps in the knowledge and skills of their inter-professional teams.KSF is an essential requirement carried out every year to guarantee pay progressions. Collaborative working is also brought about by accountability. All healthcare professionals are governed by a professional body such as the Health Professions Council (HPC) in which it is their duty to ensure compliance with the legislation on the use of protected titles (HPC, 2008) Not only are registrants accountable to the HPC they are also accountable to statutory and criminal law which means healthcare professionals must act with patients and staff on an acceptable level at the risk of being prosecuted for their actions. Another driver for collaborative working is seen through the ever scrutinizing media. A recent news report by Hughes (2011) titled Emergency cognitive process patients lives at risk, say surgeons is one of the many examples of negative media that is putting more pressure on healthcare professionals to work more collaboratively. On the other hand, many of the public viewers do not see the bias in the studyity of these news reports and many examples of good collaboration is missed.Resulting from the rationale behind wherefore people work together it is important to understand the ways in which people do work together. Safe Surgery Saves Lives was an initiative that arose in 2006 by the World Health Organization and in 2008 a Surgical Safety Checklist was released globally. Research proved that postoperative complication rates fell by 36% on average and the checklist has also improved communication among the surgical teams. (Haynes, B.A et al, 2009, Pg 496) Many trusts also have a theatre list policy and this ensures that staff are working collaboratively to ensure the lists are correct, accurate and the some important procedures have been prioritised. The idea differentiates among the trusts, but is most commonly referred to as a Group hug. This is carried out each morning before any surgical procedures commence and it is a chance for staff to meet and share any ideas or concerns over that days list.A big part of collaborative work, particularly in peri-operative care, is about recognising each others skills and grandness thus the idea of inter-professional learning. Kenward Kenward (2011, pg 35-39) outlines the importance of mentors, stating that mentors should act as role models for students of all professions. Further promoting this the General Medical Council (2006) document on good Medical Practice propounds that doctors also act as role models to try and inspire and motivate others. It is patent that there are many ways in which healthcare staff work together, however major issues are still identified around the factors that influence the outcomes of collaborative working. M iscommunication has been identified as a reoccurring problem. veritable conductal patterns among peri-operative staff which included ignoring requests they did not understand, failing to seek clarification, failing to speak loudly bountiful to be heard and communicating information to the wrong person. (Gardezi et al 2009, pg 1390-1399)This can be fatal especially in the case of Elaine Bromiley who had undergone a routine sinus surgical procedure. Due to a breakdown in communication between surgeons, Elaine unfortunately died. A video titled Just a routine operation, (LaerdalMedical, 2011) released after(prenominal) the death of Elaine Bromiley, identifies the breakdown in communication between the surgeons and the theatre nurses who had actually witnessed the surgeons put out and suggested an alternative method to intubating the patient which was ignored. This concept has been previously recognised as professional separatism. D function et al (2005) argued that because professi onal groups are educated separately they are then socialised into discipline-specific thinking.Research reason that 69% of respondents to a questionnaire they set out reported disagreement between surgeons and nurses. And that 53.4% reported experiencing aggressive behavior from consultant surgeons (Coe and Gould, 2008, Pg 609-618) Thus meaning the outcomes of collaboration will suffer if all professionals do not interact and recognize the importance of other professionals skills. It is evident that collaboration and inter-professional working largely exists but with the constant changes in peri-operative practice as mentioned previously and the way healthcare is constantly observed, especially by the media, it is evident that collaborative working is a continuous development or a lifelong learning process. As technology changes and government policies are continually released it is inevitable that the ways in which healthcare professionals work together will also change and develop .ReferencesBarret, G, Sellman, D and Thomas. J (2005) Inter-professional working in Health and Social Care captain Perspectives. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. Coe, R and Gould, D (2008) Disagreement and aggression in the operating theatre. Journal of Advanced Nursing. book of account 61, subject area 6, Pg 609-618. Day, J (2006) Inter-professional working An essential guide for health-and social-care professionals. Cheltenham Nelson Thornes. DAmour, D, Ferrada-Videla, M, San Martin Rodrigues, L and Beaulieu, M (2005) The conceptual basis for inter-professional quislingism Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Inter-professional Care. Supplement 1, Pg 116-131. Economic and Social Research Council (2005) Telemedicine revolution is disappearing from the NHS. Online addressable at www.esrc.societytoday.ac.uk. (Accessed 8 October 2011) Gardezi, F, Lingard, L, Espin, S, Whyte, S, Orser, B and Baker, G.R (2009) Silence, power and communication in the operating room. J ournal of Advanced Nursing. mountain 65, Issue 7, Pg 1390-1399. General Medical Council (2006) Good Medical Practice guidelines working in teams. Online lendable at http//www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/working_with_colleagues_working_in_teams.asp (Accessed 9 October 2011) Haynes, B.A, Weiser, G.T, Berry, R.W, Lipsitz, Sc.D et al (2009) A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population. The New England Journal of Medicine. Volume 360, Issue 5, Pg 496. Health Professions Council (2008-09) Continuing professional development annual report. Online Available at http//www.hpc-uk.org/publications/reports/ (Accessed 8 October 2011)Henderson, V (1966) The nature of Nursing A definition and its implications for practice, seek and education. New York. Macmillan. Hornby, S and Atkins, J (2000) Collaborative Care Inter-professional, interagency and interpersonal. Oxford Blackwell. Hughes, D (2011) Emergency Surgery patients lives at risk, say surgeons. BBC news. Online Available at http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-15098114 (Accessed 8 October 2011) Kenward, L and Kenward, L (2011) Promoting Inter-professional Care in the Perioperative environment. Nursing Standard. Volume 25, Issue 41, Pg 35-39. Proquest Online Available at http//proquest.umi.com/ (Accessed 9 October 2011) Laerdal Medical (2011) Just a Routine Operation Online Available at http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzlvgtPlof4 (Accessed 9 October 2011) Leathard, A (1994) Going Inter-professional Working Together for Health and Welfare. capital of the United Kingdom Routledge. Shields, L and Werder, H (2002) Perioperative Nursing. Cambridge University Press.

No comments:

Post a Comment