Modern Racism Essay

An Asiatic friend at a time had experienced racial discrimination while he was out in a fast nutriment restaurant in the city. He shared how he was the third soulfulness in line at the time, but when it was his maneuver to order his food, the food at consortant, who was a 20-something white man, simply blew him off and serviced the person next in line to him. He said that his attempts to plead his practiced to order fell to deaf ears for a while, until the attendant exclaimed, Whites first. Youre Asiatic. Of course, he felt shock and embarrassment at the time the racial discrimination disaster happened.He mentioned he couldnt believe that racism is still usual up to this day. Though the said incident whitethorn be an separate case, it still is alarming that these things still happen. Clearly, racism still isnt a thing of the past, rather, it still lingers on to the present day, hence, the term, Modern Racism. One of the applaudable explanations on prejudice that explai ns the food attendants attitude towards my Asian friend is the concept of In-Group Bias. This concept states that humans have a flop tendency to favor over other conventions the group to which they belong (Bordens & Horowitz, 2002). received enough, the food attendant chose to give his services to whites first because they have the comparable color, implying they belong in the same group, and tended to completely ignore his Asian customer because he is not white. If one must find excuse to what the food attendant did, then one can only attach that because the country is at present extremely multiracial and multicultural, people tend to hold tightly to those in the same group as they are, because only then they can feel safest and strongest.This is due to the assumption that the other members of the group will also tend to value him/her more than other members of the outgroup, in the event of a conflict. This is explained in the Social Identity Theory, an underlying possibility to explain In-Group Bias. The Social Identity Theory explains that human beings are move to positively evaluate their own groups, in order to maintain and get up self-esteem (Tafjel, 1982). When a person derogates a member of the outgroup, it enhances the ingroup and in turn, promotes positive self-evaluation (Schneider, 2004. )The racist remark and proceeding of the food attendant aims to enrapture his group, which are the white people, and this event gives a positive effect on his self-evaluation. The food attendants hostility towards my Asian friend may also be explained by the Scapegoating Theory. This theory states that frustration is a major(ip) instigation of aggression, and when this cant be restrained at the direct cause, it may be displaced onto a scapegoat (Dollard, Miller, Doob, Mowrer, & Sears, 1939).In this event, the frustration of the food attendant is from his economic status, and because he is threatened that an outgroup, who in this case is my Asian friend, has a better economic status than he is, he displaced his ira and aggression by making a racist remark and claim against my Asian friend. Now, whether it is Ingroup Bias or Scapegoating Theory which explains the racist deed best, it cannot be justified that the deed was done in good taste. Of course, racism is what it entails, it is an unjust means of categorizing people, and yet it still prevails in the modern times.Unfortunately, in that location is no foolproof way that one can prevent racism from happening. The next best thing to avoid conflict that results from stereotyping and modern racism is to keep an open mind. References Schneider, D. J. (2004). The Psychology of Stereotyping. New York The Guilford Press. Bordens, K. S. and Horowitz. (2002). Social Psychology. New tee shirt Lawrence Elbaum Associates Inc. Fisher, E. M. (1992). Modern Racism and Academic Librarianship in a Period of Diversity. gathering Proceedings, Sixth National Conference. Chicago, IL Association o f College & Research Libraries.