Idealism, Realism, and Marxism in Todays World of Politics Essays

Idealism, pragmatism, and Marxism in Todays World of regimeRealism is a method to study and practice international politics. It is the oldest crap of international relations in political history. It takes an approach where it emphasizes all sphere politics deals with the pursuit of power, and states fight for the control of this power. It makes the assumption that all states argon only motivated by national interests, which mostly is applied and presented as moral concerns. Realists desire that power can be achieved through strength. They believe that states should go after interests which are only possible to achieve. They also hint that states should not go after the interests of its opponent as that will just cause a war.Thomas Hobbes, who lived between, 1588 and 1679, was known as ?Forefather of Realism?, in his noteworthy book, Leviathan, he says if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless both cannot enjoy, they become enemies and?endeavor to destroy or s ubdue one other. This is the basic idea around which Realism is based, that is, meshing is inevitable.Hans Morgenthau was also one of the great thinkers of realism, he lived between 1904 and 1980, he was convince that politics is essentially a struggle for power, and in his most famous book, Politics Among Nations, he explains this conviction by saying, ... the struggle for power is usual in time and space and is an undeniable fact of experience ... blush though anthropologists have shown that certain primitive people seem to be free from desire for power, nobody has yet shown how their state of mind and the conditions downstairs which they live can be recreated on a worldwide plate so as to eliminate the struggle for power from the internatio... ...s political theories and analysis of international relations, it is still a phenomenon which is very unpredictable and situational. But in spite of this, these theories are still relevant and important because they help to streng then a proper framework for analyzing international relations. I also regain that a combination of these theories would be more successful in reasonableness and implementing in international relations rather than focusing and practicing one of the theories.Bibliography internationalist Politics on a World Stage ? John T. Rourke HYPERLINK http//www.utm.edu/ question/iep/p/polreal.html http//www.utm.edu/research/iep/p/polreal.html HYPERLINK http//www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pol116/realism.html http//www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pol116/realism.html4) http//www.unet.univie.ac.at/a8700288/research/ODYSSEY.html