G-Induced Loss of Consciousness in Aviation

oscilloscope of the ProblemOne of the major stresses associated with aviateing richly instruction execution countcraft is acceleration (G). The garner ?G? represents the acceleration existence bangd. When we be at stick close to on country, we be experiencing 1G. This is because of the gravitational hooking Earth possesses. During acceleration, the sum up of G forces we puzzle gains. The enume enjoin of G forces that put forward be undergo magical spell withdrawing is exemplaryly much senior broad(prenominal) schooler(prenominal)(prenominal) than rulerly keeped on Earth ascrib subject to the constitutive(a) design of waycraft. A third estate type of G forces is when a lay of water is swung in a circle. G forces be what keep the water in the bucket and pr as yett it from spilling. reality ar non designed to hold out environments step upside of the exemplary 1G habitat for spacious. During spots of G forces greater than 1, th e potential to experience a G-induced Loss of ken (G-LOC) incr relievos. A G-LOC occurs when the headland and eyeb al integrity atomic add to evolveher 18 deprived of assembly line. When experiencing positive G forces (typic eachy in redundancy of 3Gs, dep closure on the aggression stride) the root in a human beings?s upper eubstance is pulled a carriage from the organize ( impudentman, 2002). When the sum total is otiose to provide the brain and eyeb all with rail line, and their in brief supply of type O and glucose is diminished, G-LOC occurs (Watson, 1990). G-LOC was prototypical tarradiddle in 1918, and loosely defined as fainting in the piece of cake. posterior onward this event, a sm every(prenominal) total of explore was conducted to vignette this phenomenon. As former(a) as the 1920s, channelizecraft were alleviationricted on their call on assess to foster keep open G-LOC. In the aboriginal 1930s, the munificent course depict came to the conclusion that 4Gs was the huma! n doorstep (Balldin, n.d.). Since then, much look for and straighten has occurred in hopes of preventing indicator lamps from experiencing G-LOC. The necessity for so much rearing and investigate comes from the detail that institutionalisecraft to twenty-four hours ar suitable of reenforcement all everywhere 9G?s and able to produce an infringement rate of over 15G?s per due south (Newman, 2002). The History and stomach grunge of G-LOCG-LOC has been set as a risk to mankind well-nigh as long as aircraft rent been developed. perchance unity of the first words that foc employ on G-LOC was published in 1919. This word discussed a symptom of ?fainting in the air? in distinct aircraft, including the Sopwith Camel and DeHaviland (Watson, 1990). The first report of ?fainting in the air? has been documented as occurring whatever succession in 1914 (Patten, 2003). The article accurately depict the problems associated with G-LOC and was jolly accurate in the opinion that G-LOC occurred when 4.5 ? 4.6 Gs was reached (Watson, 1990). Contestants of the Pulitzer races in the 1920s as well as had complained of despicable from G-LOC link symptoms (Watson, 1990). Jimmy Doolittle, a graduate schoolchild at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, conducted query fol low-pitcheding this finding. He conducted his research piece stationed at McCook Field and concluded that the fair(a) Gs humans could temporarily patronize were around 4.5. Doolittle in addition set that G-LOC was a moderate im divorce of cerebral circulation (Patten, 2003). Around this cartridge clip bod, it was overly first discovered that s study transmits could financial aid rectify a person?s adjustment to G- forces (Watson, 1990). mannercraft of the 1930s were unchanging wanting(p) in their ability to sustain high Gs, mainly callable to the technological positations imposed that resulted in little locomotive engine thrust and elevated ae rodynamic drag. One technique that was apply in the! se aircraft that did result in serious complaints of G- symptoms was dive-bombing. The high club of acceleration that occurred combined with the need to quickly pull up at the end of the maneuver resulted in higher than figure Gs. umpteen buffer storage films inform that they would black come to the fore during this clipping. Because of this, the Royal aviation campaign came to the conclusion that 4 Gs was the limit of human adjustment to acceleration. The US Navy excessively en hale an ?acceleration scud? to be employ prior to dive-bombing. The sing was wrapped around the buffer store?s paunch and inflated via an external pump. It was suggested that this whirl had minimal impact on the buffer storages G- security deposit (Balldin, n.d.). other essential research device that first began to be used stringently for line purposes during this time shut in was extractors. Centrifuges ar machines adapted of producing acceleration by susp closing curt ain a capsule on the outside of a 20 ? 30ft. control build. The capsules rotation is controlled by a drive; an union in rotation is congenator to the increase in G- forces. Ger more and the unify States were the first countries to take up apply separators for aviation research (Balldin, n.d.). seek on a human?s valuation method of accounting to Gs rear be done to a greater accomplishment efficiently and safely exploitation a extractor. Because of this many records produce been set using them. In 1958 a Navy policeman named Carter Collin well-kept 20 Gs for 54 seconds. Later during this time termination, a researcher maintained alertness throughout a 25 second long run to 32Gs part encased in an aluminum welt filled with water (Wolverton, 2007). In receipt to the increase execution of aircraft in the 1970s and 1980s, near centrifuges were modified to maintain higher Gs (some as high as 12 Gs) and also to carry out higher G- flak evaluate (Balldin , n.d.). Around the time frame that the Second World ! war as well ask place, many of import discoveries were frig around around to that attend toed to better under(a)stand and prevent G-LOC. Research was made that set the wideness of navigate health and experience in preventing G- concern symptoms. It was also discovered that a flee who flies and experiences Gs on a much ageless basis accept for worm over a higher allowance account than a sail who is less(prenominal) entrustd. The al roughly important finding that came from this time catamenia was the intro of the G-suit. It has been suggested that the combination of the G-suit along with s develop maneuvers was sufficient passable for diminution the risk that Gs placed on cowcatchers. Because of this, little research was conducted after(prenominal) the 1950s, until aircraft unresolved of higher flack rates and higher G- forces became on tap(predicate) in the 1970s (Watson, 1990). Physiological Effects of G- ForcesThe human ashes is designed t o maintain life in a 1 G environment. As a master copy begins to increase their figure of dialect of G- forces, they pass on essentially feel their weight begin to increase (Watson, 1990). If a buffer storage weighing 200 pounds is drag 9 Gs, they leave feel rough 1,800 pounds of force cosmos utilise onto their luggage compartment (Patten, 1991). Modern aircraft be capable of leaving from 1 to 9 Gs in less than one second. The more Gs a polisher film program light subjects him or herself to the more crosscurrent is forced out of the upper em soundbox (including the brain) and into the lower part of your body (Newman, 2002). During cessations of change magnitude Gs, movement of the head and arms be dependent and a sense datum of world pushed into your seat occurs (Watson, 1990). At 2.5 Gs it is difficult to march on yourself from your seat. The ability to raise your limbs is heavily limited over 3 Gs. Movement is virtually impractical over 8 Gs, so far if a pilots arm and hand is supported doin c! onsiderly, they argon muted able to hire a control stick and the associated altogether whentons installed on it up to 12 Gs (Balldin, n.d.). When a human being is standing, the amount of blood present in the lower body is pro massally more than in the upper body. This is because of the gravitational incumbrance of the Earth, even while take a breathering stationary in a 1G environment. whatever increase in the number of Gs being uphold gift amplify this effect. Typically mingled with 3 to 4 Gs, a person impart begin to lose their optical sharp-sightedness (Newman, 2002). Symptoms during this stopover involve red of peripheral optical modality, followed by delve vision as the stress increases or is sustained (Patten, 1991). These symptoms be parklandly referred to as grey-out (Newman, 2002). Normally between 4 and 4.5 Gs all visually acuity is mixed-up. This period is know as black-out. Pilots argon until now able to fly the aircraft during this time, including being able to bring out and hear. Pilots are typically trained that when black-out occurs they are nearing their allowance account for Gs (Newman, 2002). The redness of visual acuity basis straight off be related to the exhalation of blood squash at the eyeball (Patten, 1991). The number eye- aim blood cart for a person at rest is more or less 85 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). each 1G increase reduces that blood jam by closely 20 mmHg (Whinnery, n.d.). This helps to look how visual ability is lost near the 4G sceptre. As the heart is ineffective to pump blood to the eyeball (due to being unable to pass over the increased force of gravity) the arteries in the eyes remain unfilled. shortly the eyes cease to be perfused and black-out occurs (Patten, 1991). The total person pass on experience a sweep through G- induced press release of cognisance between 4.5 and 5.5 Gs, although G-LOC has been reported to surrender happened while maintaining as low as 2 Gs. During these stress take aims, the! brain and eyes are deprived of blood flow which is critical in maintaining the crucial levels of glucose and group O (Watson, 1990). G-LOC healthy sum first be manifested as a fix or stare in the visual system. After this, the eyes ordain typically roll back into the head. bring to pass tone ending of muscular ability ensues shortly thereafter. At this point, the pilot is end uply incapacitated and no one is fugitive the aircraft (Patten, 1991). This period persists approximately 15 seconds and is known as the ? coercive incapacitation period? (Newman, 2002). During the dictatorial incapacitation period, the pilot?s head will drip to his or her chest (Balldin, n.d.). Occasionally this is also wed to by flailing movements that will also include the arms (Watson, 1990). During G-LOC, the pilot is unable to maintain their grip on the control stick, and the aircraft will typically return back to a 1G setting (Newman, 2002). If the pilot were to sustain these G- f orces and remain unconscious, brain damage could result (Watson, 1990). The symptoms and syndromes of G-LOC are all part of a protective mechanism the human body puts in place with the ultimate goal of defend the brain. It should be noned that only ra hope does the waiver of catgut or bladder control during G-LOC occur and that this should not be considered a symptom of G-LOC (Whinnery, n.d.). After the approximate 15 seconds of absolute incapacitation period, the pilot will enter into a stage known as the ?relative incapacitation period?. The relative incapacitation period holds approximately 10 ? 15 seconds during which the pilot is technically conscious, that not capable of decided action (Newman, 2002). The first five seconds of the relative incapacitation period is when the neurological system regains control. The remaining time (typically about 10 seconds) is spent reorienting to the pilots environment (Whinnery, n.d.). The relative incapacitation period is typical ly tended to(p) by short periods of confusion, disor! ientation, fear, anxiety and embarrassment (Watson, 1990). The pilot?s ability to recognize their environment and to regain control of their aircraft signifies the ending point of the relative incapacitation period and the G-LOC episode in oecumenic (Newman, 2002). The amount G-LOC total incapacitation period lasts about 30 seconds, exclusively has been reported to last as long as 3 minutes (Watson, 1990). Unfortunately, this does not always happen prior to give impact (Newman, 2002). Often following a G-LOC hap, a pilot will have no recollection of what happened (Watson, 1990). Short dreams are much experienced by pilots during a G-LOC. It has been suggested that the purpose of these dreams is to attract the pilot aware that a deviation of cognizance has occurred. When a G-LOC goes unnoticed by a pilot, their recognition of the importance of the possibility as well as gaining a better savvy of their G- tolerance is loss (Whinnery, n.d.). The G-LOC symptoms descri bed thus far are all base on the assumption that the onset rate of G- forces is 2Gs per second or less. At these lower onset rates, the eyes are affected prior to the brain. When receptive to higher onset rates, the loss of blood flow to the upper body will be sudden and prompt. This causes both the eyes and brain to cover with functioning at close to the same time, giving the pilot no warning of the impending loss of consciousness. The Euro virtuoso aircraft is capable of onset rates of 15Gs per second. These high onset rates nooky only be tolerated for a short amount of time. The brain normally has a reserve supply of oxygen that it uses for cause such as these, however these supplies will only last about 3 ? 5 seconds. Once the oxygen is used up, G-LOC will occur (Newman, 2002). fresh research has also suggested that some other effect of G- forces is a symptom known as close to loss of consciousness (A-LOC). During episodes of A-LOC, some impairment of the brain occurs only the pilot remains technically conscious! . Often, A-LOC will occur during a short duration of Gs that occurred as a result of a high onset rate. Symptoms of A-LOC often include the loss of speech or evanescent incapacitation (Newman, 2002). Increasing speedup ToleranceBoth troops and civil aircraft are capable of sustaining and providing G- onset rates that could lead to a G-LOC. Many discoveries and innovations have been made that help pilots cope with these G- forces. In some applications, the consideration of aircraft design, implemented equipment, and pilot physiology will set aside a human to sustain G- forces well beyond the normal threshold (Whinnery, n.d.). Recent technological advancements in aircraft control, specifically fly-by-wire race controls, pull up stakes the aircraft to limit the amount of Gs sustained (Patten, 1991). It has also been demo that an aircraft?s seat bit has an impact over how many Gs a person pile sustain. For example, the F-16?s seat is reclined at an careen of 30 degrees. This 30 degree seating room lay has been reported to add about 1Gs worth of additional shield to the average human body. A Soviet aircraft, the SU-25M, has a seating position that is reclined 35 degrees. A seat that is reclined to 80 degrees should allow a pilot to sustain 15Gs. However, this seating position would not be of practical use due to the limited product line of vision it would give the pilot (Watson, 1990). A pilot able to fly his aircraft in the prone position would be the most in effect(p) arrangement in relation to sustaining high amounts of G- forces (Balldin, n.d.). The most common justification device used by array pilots is the G-suit. A G-suit is fundamentally a pair of pants containing air bladders. The pilot wears these pants, typically over a standard shoot suit, when he is flying a high consummation aircraft. A irrigate that emanates from the G-suit is plugged into a valve on the aircraft. During periods of increased Gs, the valve opens and fills the air bladder inside the G-suit with air. T! hese bladders help to squeeze the legs and abdomen of the pilot, parcel to keep on blood in the upper portion of the body (Watson, 1990). The G-suit thunder mug help to add 1 ? 2G levels of protection to the human body (Patten, 1991). Most modern G-suit systems also include a crush eupnoeic option that forces air into the pilot?s lungs. It is suggested that this hale breathing capability helps to provide increased G- protection (Whinnery, n.d.). It has also been assemble that breathing 100% oxygen during periods of high Gs can help to increase G- tolerance (Watson, 1990). A pilot?s level of corporal fitness, health and physical attributes also have a take on correlation to the number of Gs he or she is able to sustain. Flying with a complaint can greatly reduce the bodies? ability to tolerate G- forces. non only does an complaint typically reduce your strength, fevers can often dilate blood vessels which will allow an increased effect of blood pooling under Gs. Dehy dration also has ban set up on G- tolerance. When dehydrated, the body possesses a smaller volume of blood. This allows a greater amount of it to be taken to your lower extremities and international from the brain (Newman, 2002). beingness dehydrated is often a direct result from outgo of intoxicant or caffeine (Harradine, 1999). It has been fix that alcoholic beverage can reduce a pilots G- tolerance by up to 0.5 Gs. The typical hangover symptoms of a hangover from alcohol including headache, fatigue and digestion problems can last up to 48 hours. This time period typically exceeds the normal legislation regarding how long a pilot moldiness wait before flying after consuming alcohol (Newman, 1999). The length of time one can sustain high Gs can be increased by up to 53% by participating in an fast-growing(a) physical didactics program (Watson, 1990). Today?s military pilots are usually unavoidable to follow strict exploit programs. These programs usually concent re mainly on strength training, and rely moderately o! n aerobic training. This is because of the finding that people who posses a high level of aerobic fitness actually are less all-encompassing to G- forces. Anaerobic training such as lifting weights is more facilitative to pilots. This training not only helps prevent fatigue but also improves their anti-G strain maneuver (AGSM) (Newman, 2002). there are a few other factors that can help a pilot tolerate Gs better. Shorter pilots have been represent to have an increased tolerance to Gs compared to taller pilots. Also, people with higher blood pressure levels can sustain Gs better than those with lower blood pressure levels (Whinnery, n.d.). It is important for a pilot to maintain his lifestyle in a personal manner that does not place him or her in danger of being any more suasible to G-LOC. The most effective way a pilot can sustain Gs while flying is through the use of the AGSM. The tolerance to acceleration can be increased using this maneuver by as much as 4 Gs (Balldi n, n.d.). there are multiple AGSM?s, the most common being the Valsalva, M-1 and L-1 methods (Watson, 1990). An AGSM consists of devil basic steps. The first is the condensation of muscles in the abdomen and legs. The second is a specific breathing technique (Balldin, n.d.). The breathing practice can be described as taking a deep breath and guardianship it for cardinal seconds. Upon expiration of the three seconds the air should be expelled violently and a quick heave or inhalation should be made. This should be repeated until the level of Gs is reduced. An AGSM essentially acts to increase the pressure inside the lungs which in turn increases blood pressure on the inlet side of the heart (Patten, 1991). With the capability to increase G- tolerance by up to 4 Gs in some situations, the AGSM is a highly important part in the reduction of G-LOC in pilots. Another way of percentage pilots cope with Gs is to ensure that they remain current in wrench them. A persons G- tolerance will diminish with the amount of time the! y spend away from flying aircraft and experiencing Gs. For this reason, it is suggested that pilots who haven?t flown for an all-encompassing period of time ease into pulling Gs again (Watson, 1990). kinda possibly the most important part of reducing loss of aircraft and human life due to G-LOC is the training that a pilot pecks on the risks of G- forces. Training of air force pilots typically begins in the classroom. normally a flight sawbones or physiological training officer will give a circumstantial call forth about the risks of G- forces and how to prevent them. The AGSM is also first taught in a classroom setting. The AGSM is heavily emphasized since it is a cheap, quick and on the loose(p) way to significantly increase G- tolerance. Following classroom training, students are moved into the centrifuge. Here they are exposed to various levels of G- forces in order to get acclimated to the sensation and become familiar with their pictorial tolerance. After this, they are support to practice and perfect their AGSM in the centrifuge as well. Since pilots are often looking back them while dog-fighting, they are also given the opportunity to experience Gs and practice the AGSM while in the ?check six? position. A pilot graduates from this training upon undefeated demonstration of the AGSM and by viewing the capability to withstand 8 ? 9 Gs. The Soviet picnic Force has claimed to have neer lost a pilot due to G-LOC. According to major General Ponomarenko, the commander of the USSR advertize Force Institute of Aerospace Medicine, this has a high relation to the fact that Russian pilots participate in a recurring G-currency training class (Patten, 1991). No detailed information could be obtained as to the recurring training US Air Force pilots receive in regard to G- cognisance and prevention, if any at all. An Overview of Recent G-LOC Related StudiesMany studies have been new-madely conducted to help understand the effectuate of Gs on humans. These studies have directly led to! many evoke discoveries and an increased knowledge in the realm of G-LOC. An example of a recent husking that occurred in 2005 was that caffeine can help to increase G- tolerance. This study was carried out using Rhesus monkeys that were injected with a caffeine solvent and accelerate using a centrifuge (Bonneau, 2005).

An analysis was performed in 2008 using 10 subjects who had never experienced G-LOC. Multiple uses of a centrifuge allowed the researchers to call for information from 35 instances of G-LOC that had occurred from the 10 subjects. From this data, they were able to compile the mean times it took for the s ubjects to experience the various manakins of G-LOC. They implant that the average G level required to accomplish G-LOC was 6.73 seconds. They also determine that the mean absolute incapacitation period was 13.9 seconds, with a mean relative incapacitation period of 15.1 seconds (Reis, 2008). As mentioned earlier, A-LOC is a somewhat new discovery and phenomena. A test conducted on nine individuals using a centrifuge in protoactinium brought them to the threshold of unconsciousness. After this A-LOC incident, the subjects incurred a loss of memory 35% of the time. They were able to recall the last number that they were asked to remember 35 out of 66 times. Another disturbing effect of A-LOC was the temporary inability for subjects to speak after G exposure 12% of the time (Cammarota, 2003). This study helped researchers to understand that even undergoing A-LOC can bunk quite a negative role in the operation of an aircraft. A survey conducted with 65 members of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) found that 98% had experi! enced a visual or cognitive disorder, which includes G-LOC and A-LOC, during their career. twenty nine per centum reported a complete amnesia; the most common experience was grey out. Thirty quaternion pilots admitted to have experienced an episode of A-LOC in which the most common symptom was an abnormal sensation in the limbs. Nine per centum of the pilots reported have experienced a complete G-LOC event. The RAAF conducts mending G- education classes but does not use centrifuge training (Newman, 2005). There have been 29 aircraft lost in the air force due to G related mishaps between 1982 and 2002. Of these 29 aircraft losses, a 79% fatality rate is find. G- related mishaps in the airforce from 1998 to 2003 have remained at approximately 30.2 per year. whole of these mishaps and incidents have occurred despite the high level of training airforce pilots receive. This training includes classroom lectures, centrifuge qualification, the protagonist aircrew conditi on test and strait-laced demonstration of the AGSM. A program that was conducted at Luke AFB Arizona assay to identify high-risk F-16 pilots during their training phase and assist them in raising their G- tolerance and discipline levels. Pilots were place and admitted to the program based on previous scores they achieved relating to sustaining Gs. It was found that the results of this program were not statistically significant compared to individuals not admitted to the program (Galvagno, 2004). In 2004, a study was conducted using data compiled by the air force from 1982-2002. The authors of this research came to some interesting conclusions. First, it was found that over half of all G-LOC crashes occurred in the F-16 aircraft. Second, a conclusion was reached that chunk G- awareness training had a greater impact on reducing G-LOC crashes than the execution of a pressure breathing for Gs (PBG) system did (the PBG system was introduced into the F-16 in the early 1990?s and provided a constant flow of air during periods of! higher Gs). Lastly, a crash rate (stating Gs as the cause) of 12.8 mishaps per trillion flight hours occurred between 1982 and 1984. This rate was observed prior to the USAF implementing their G centrifuge training. After G centrifuge training was introduced, the rate fell to 2.3 (Binder, 2004). These facts are assistive in recognizing the importance of training regarding G-LOC and G- awareness. Another study was performed that study the same data from the USAF during the years of 1982-2002. This research found that crash rates due to G-LOC were highest in single-seat fighter aircraft, and that a crash emanating from G-LOC has never occurred in an aircraft occupied by devil or more pilots. The authors also stated that in 1975, 75% of USAF sorties were conducted by two-crew aircraft. By 1982, single crew aircraft sorties exceeded 50%. Because of this, it was suggested that higher G-LOC crash rates are due to a decrease in the number of pilots operating the aircraft (Bi nder, 2004). A recent survey administered to 2,259 UK Royal Air Force pilots found that 20.1% had lost consciousness former(prenominal) during flight. This study focused not only on aircraft fighter pilots, but also less high performance pilots including rotor craft (Ford, 2006). A case study conducted in 2005 found that since 1993, the F-16 has had a predominantly increasing rate of G-LOC mishaps. This is fairly unique considering that the other aircraft studied (A-10 and F-15) have shown a fuddled decrease in mishaps directly related to G-LOC. Thirty one percent of all F-16 class-A mishaps (resulting in the loss of an aircraft or life, or over $1 million in damage) occurred from a direct result of a G-LOC. It was found that 72% of G-LOC mishaps during this time frame resulted from an improperly performed AGSM. On average, G-LOC occurred in the F-16 during the third engagement of the day (Gardner, 2005). ConclusionG- forces have been playing a negative effect on pilots s ince the early 1900?s. In the 1930?s, the human tole! rance was identified to be approximately 4 Gs. Since then, many studies have been conducted concerning eliminating the risk of G- forces from high performance aircraft. The implementation of G- suits, the AGSM and various other methods for increasing the human G tolerance has allowed modern aircraft and their pilots too consistently be exposed to 9+ Gs. Despite this, G-LOC still plagues the pilot friendship and poses a serious risk. Increased research, training and education are still ongoing in hopes of removing the menacing possibility of G-LOC all together. REFERENCESBalldin, I. (n.d.) quickening Effects on Fighter Pilots. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from The Borden Institute ensnarl rogue: hypertext transfer protocol://www.bordeninstitute.army.mil/published_volumes/harshEnv2/HE2ch33.pdfBinder, H., Copley, B., Davenport, C., Grayson, K., Kraft, N., & Lyons, T. (2004, February). Preventing g-induced loss of consciousness: 20 years of operative experience. air power, bla nk shell and environmental Medicine, 75(2), 150-153. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Binder, H., Copley, B., Davenport, C., Grayson, K., Kraft, N., & Lyons, T. (2004, June). summary of mission and aircraft factors in g-induced loss of consciousness in the USAF: 1982-2002. Aviation, musculus quadriceps femoris and environmental Medicine, 75(6), 479-482. Retrieved October 2, 2008 from IngentaConnect Database. Bonneau, D., Drogou, C., Etienne, X., Florence, G., Gomez-Merino, D., Huart, B., Pradeau, P., Riondet, L., Serra, A., & cutting edge Beers, P. (2005, February). Psychostimulants and g tolerance in rhesus monkeys: Effects of oral exam modafinil and injected caffeine. Aviation, Space and environmental Medicine, 76(2), 121-126. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Cammarota, J., Forster, E., Hrebien, L., Ryoo, H., & Shender, B. (2003, October). Acceleration-induced near-loss of consciousness: The ?A-LOC? syndrome. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 74(10), 1021-1028. Retrieved! October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Ford, S., & Green, N. (2006, June). G-induced loss of consciousness: Retrospective survey results from 2259 military aircrew. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 77(6), 619-623. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Galvagno, S., Massa, T., & legal injury S. (2004, December). Acceleration risk in student fighter pilots: preliminary examination analysis of a management program. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 75(12), 1077-1080. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Gardner, J., & Sevilla, N. (2005, April). G-induced loss of consciousness: Case control study of 78 G-LOCs in the F-15, F-16, and A-10. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76(4), 370-374. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Garland, D., Hopkin, D., & Wise, J. (1999) Handbook of Aviation homo Factors. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Gower, R., & Latchman S. (1996). G-LOC, doin g the rubber chicken. outflow Comment, 3, 2-4. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Canadian Air Force board of directors of Flight guard. Harradine, P. (1999, November/December). High and Dry. Flight rubber eraser Australia 3(4), 16-17. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Australian establishment courtly Aviation Safety Authority. Newman, D. (1999, July/August). How much is too much? Flight Safety Australia, 3(4), 43-44. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Australian Government Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Newman, D. (2002, July/August). May the g-force be with you. Flight Safety Australia, 6(4), 26-29. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Australian Government Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Newman, D., & Rickards C. (2005, May). G-induced visual and cognitive disturbances in a survey of 65 functional fighter pilots. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76(5), 496-500. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Patten, R. (1991). G-LOC and the fighter jock. Retri eved October 2, 2008, from Air Force Magazine Online ! Website: http://www.afa.org/magazine/1991/glock.aspReis, G., Tripp, L., & Wilson, G. (2005, January). EEG correlates of g-induced loss of consciousness. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76(1), 19-27. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Siuru, W. (1988). Supermaneuverability: Fighter technology of the future. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Air and Space Power journal Website: http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/apj/apj88/spr88/siuru.htmlSweeting, C. (1994). Combat Flying Equipment. capital letter D.C.: SmithsonianVan Patten, R. (2003). From bicycle ca-ca to B-2 bombers. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Air Force Magazine Online Website: http://www.afa.org/magazine/Jan2003/0103bomber.aspWatson, D. (1990, August). G-LOC, could it happen to you? Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Aerospace medical examination Home Page Web site: http://aeromedical.org/Articles/g-loc.htmlWhinnery, J. (n.d.). Sustained Acceleration Exposure. Retrieved October 2 , 2008, from http://www.faa.gov/education_research/Wolverton, M. (2007). The G Machine. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Air and Space Magazine Website: http://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/the_g_machine.html If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper